Skip to main content
Advertisement
Home

Main navigation

  • Digital Issue Archive
  • Service Directory
  • Awards
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe now

Secondary

  • Travel Insurance
  • Policies & Partnerships
  • Travel Risk Management
  • Travel Trends
  • Hospitals & Healthcare
  • Industry Moves
  • Reviews
International Hospitals & Healthcare Part of the IH&H family
Part of the
IH&H family
International Hospitals & Healthcare

Foreign ministry advisory reversal puts NZ travel insurers back under conflict exclusion spotlight

Travel Insurance
23 Jul 2026 | Chloe Fox
Share
Foreign ministry advisory reversal puts NZ travel insurers back under conflict exclusion spotlight

New Zealand insurers face renewed scrutiny over conflict exclusions as rapidly changing MFAT advisories expose gaps between travel risk, customer expectations, and policy coverage

New Zealand travel insurers are facing renewed questions over conflict exclusions after the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade (MFAT) reversed a recent easing of travel advice for several Gulf destinations.

MFAT lifted the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, and Oman back to level 2 in June following a brief de-escalation in regional tensions. However, the advisory was raised again to level 3 on 20 July, advising New Zealanders to avoid non-essential travel.

The reversal has implications for travellers who booked or reinstated policies during the lower-risk period. Once destinations return to higher advisory levels, war and conflict exclusions may again become central to claims decisions.

The issue is significant for New Zealand’s outbound market, with Gulf hubs including Dubai, Doha, and Abu Dhabi serving as major transit points for travellers heading to Europe and beyond.

Southern Cross Travel Insurance (SCTI) reported 51 Middle East-related claims between 28 February and 28 June 2026, with its war and violence exclusion applied to all or part of each claim, according to Stuff. The total number of affected claims across the market has not been disclosed.

Conflict exclusions remain standard across New Zealand travel insurance providers, with insurers citing the difficulty of pricing unpredictable geopolitical risks.

The shifting advisory environment also raises conduct questions under New Zealand’s CoFI regime for financial institutions, particularly around customer communication, disclosure, and claims handling.

IATA recently reported a 3.4% fall in air passenger demand, largely due to the ongoing conflict in the Middle East between the US/Israel and Iran.

Travel Insurance
23 Jul 2026
Share

Chloe Fox

Chloe Fox is an Editorial Assistant for Voyageur Group, joining in 2024. She writes for ITIJ and AirMed&Rescue, covering a range of topics including international travel and health insurance, medical assistance provision, and air medical transportation. Chloe holds a BA (Hons) in English and an MA in English Literature from the University of Bristol.

Keep on reading

No results

There are no results available matching your search term.

Why subscribe to ITIJ?

In-depth analysis

In-depth analysis

Unique insights and expert opinions on the latest industry developments

A wider perspective

A wider perspective

Get the global view on the topics that are trending in your region

Breaking news

Breaking news

ITIJ.com has all the latest news relevant to travel insurance and IPMI professionals

Subscribe now
ITIJ IH&H

Footer menu

  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Voyageur
International Travel & Health Insurance Conferences

Social

  • LinkedIn link
  • Twitter link

© Voyageur Publishing & Events 2026

Close