Skip to main content
Advertisement
Home

Main navigation

  • Digital Issue Archive
  • Service Directory
  • Awards
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe now

Secondary

  • Travel Insurance
  • Policies & Partnerships
  • Travel Risk Management
  • Travel Trends
  • Hospitals & Healthcare
  • Industry Moves
  • Reviews
International Hospitals & Healthcare Part of the IH&H family
Part of the
IH&H family
International Hospitals & Healthcare

Carnival loses Ruby Princess class action ruling

Travel Trends
26 Oct 2023 | Oliver Cuenca
Share
Legal scales

Cruise line operator Carnival has been found to have been negligent in its duty of care to passengers in a ruling by Australia’s Federal Court

In a class action ruling by the Federal Court of Australia, Carnival’s Australian division has been ordered to pay the medical expenses of a woman who contracted Covid-19 on its Ruby Princess cruise ship during the early days of the pandemic.

The judge, Justice Angus Stewart, ruled that Carnival Australia had misled passengers about the measures it had in place to protect them from the virus. Stewart also found that the company should have cancelled its March 2020 return cruise from Sydney to New Zealand on the Ruby Princess.

The court awarded lead plaintiff Susan Karpik A$4,423.48 for out-of-pocket medical expenses. It did not grant damages, however.

Karpik – who had been travelling on the ship when her husband Henry fell ill with Covid-19 – had originally claimed over A$360,000 in damages, in part due to the distress caused by husband’s two-month hospitalisation with the virus. At one point, he was given only days to live.

Further plaintiff payments expected

The court is expected to now consider the claims of the remaining parties in the case – which has around 1,000 Australian plaintiffs, including Henry Karpik.

A further 700 US passengers may be included in the class action, pending a ruling by the Australian High Court. A decision on that is expected in late 2023 or early 2024.

Vicky Antzoulatos, Joint Head of Class Actions at Shine Lawyers – the law firm representing the Australian claimants – told Reuters: “Although the judge found Mrs Karpik didn’t meet the threshold for pain and suffering damages, other passengers will. The case in point is Mrs Karpik’s husband, who was in intensive care for weeks and suffered serious injuries.”

Carnival Australia said in a statement it was considering the judgement in detail. The operator denied during the case that it knew prior to the voyage that the risk of contracting Covid-19 was higher on a cruise ship than in ordinary circumstances.

Alex Wright explored the current provision of assistance to cruise passengers in the August 2023 issue of ITIJ.

Travel Trends
26 Oct 2023
Share

Oliver Cuenca

Oliver Cuenca is a Junior Editor for Voyageur Group, joining in 2021. He writes for both ITIJ and AirMed&Rescue, covering a range of topics including international travel and health insurance, medical assistance provision and air medical transportation. He also serves as Title Editor of the Assistance & Repatriation Reviews. Oliver holds an MA in Magazine Journalism from Cardiff University, as well as a BA in English with Creative Writing from Falmouth University.

Keep on reading

No results

There are no results available matching your search term.

Why subscribe to ITIJ?

In-depth analysis

In-depth analysis

Unique insights and expert opinions on the latest industry developments

A wider perspective

A wider perspective

Get the global view on the topics that are trending in your region

Breaking news

Breaking news

ITIJ.com has all the latest news relevant to travel insurance and IPMI professionals

Subscribe now
ITIJ IH&H

Footer menu

  • About Us
  • Subscribe
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Voyageur
International Travel & Health Insurance Conferences

Social

  • LinkedIn link
  • Twitter link

© Voyageur Publishing & Events 2026

Close