A complex cardiac patient requiring specialised treatment
Megan Morgan and Kyle Austin from AirCARE1’s medical crew describe a high-acuity transport across the US
AirCARE1 was activated to transport a 33-year-old male from Arizona to Mayo Clinic in Minnesota for advanced evaluation and possible heart-liver transplantation. Following a syncopal episode and cardiac arrest at home, the patient required intubation and advanced resuscitative care before circulation returned. Persistent cardiac instability necessitated atrial and ventricular transvenous pacing, intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) support, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), invasive haemodynamic monitoring, and continuous medication infusions.
His acuity and dependence on multiple advanced therapies made this a high-risk mission requiring meticulous preparation, specialised expertise, and coordinated teamwork.
Preparation and clinical coordination
Before departure, the AirCARE1 team received a comprehensive clinical report, allowing the crew to assess the patient, anticipate complications, confirm equipment compatibility, calculate medication and oxygen needs, prepare backup supplies, and finalise a tailored transport plan.
An operational risk management assessment identified increased risk from clinical complexity, extended distance, multiple devices, and potential for rapid deterioration. These factors required additional staffing; two critical care nurses and one critical care paramedic.
Roles were assigned before transport. One clinician managed the IABP, catheter integrity and distal perfusion. The second managed medication infusions, respiratory support, and invasive haemodynamic monitoring. The third oversaw transvenous pacing systems and coordinated care.
Clear responsibilities, closed-loop communication, and shared awareness supported timely intervention and patient safety.
Patient assessment and advanced clinical care
At the referring facility, the patient was alert and oriented. He had been successfully extubated but continued to require HFNC through a Hamilton-T1 ventilator and H900 humidification system.
Additional therapies included a left femoral IABP, atrial and ventricular transvenous pacing, three continuous life-sustaining infusions, multiple central venous access points, arterial and central venous pressure monitoring, and a SwanGanz catheter.
Transporting this high-risk patient required constant vigilance. The crew monitored cardiac and respiratory status, IABP function, and medication delivery while remaining prepared for haemodynamic deterioration, device failure, or interruption of therapy. Frequent reassessment and contingency planning helped maintain stability.
Compassionate, holistic care
The crew recognised that exceptional care extended beyond devices and medications. Because long-range transport can leave patients frightened and vulnerable, the team also prioritised comfort, dignity, and emotional wellbeing.
By clearly communicating procedures and care changes in advance, the team helped the patient stay informed and maintain a sense of control. The crew’s calm presence, active listening, and reassuring touch eased anxiety, while warm blankets, supportive positioning, therapeutic music, and aromatherapy promoted comfort.
These interventions were not separate from his medical care; they were essential to caring for him as a whole person rather than as a collection of diagnoses and devices.
Equipment and transport considerations
Multiple life-supporting therapies created significant equipment and logistical challenges within the aircraft. The crew simultaneously managed the IABP, pacing systems, medication infusions, respiratory support, and invasive monitoring.
Equipment had to remain secure, accessible, and organised while preserving continuous patient access. Because of the IABP catheter location, positioning and transfers required particular attention to prevent interruption of therapy. Coordinated movement and communication maintained uninterrupted support throughout transport.
Conclusion
High-acuity transport demands preparation, adaptability, and sound clinical judgement. Through defined roles, meticulous equipment management, continuous reassessment, and clear communication across all teams, the AirCARE1 crew safely transferred the patient and completed a thorough handoff to the receiving facility for lifesaving specialty care. This mission reflected our highest standard of care: clinical excellence delivered with compassion throughout the journey.
Co-authored by: Megan Morgan, BSN, RN, ATCN and Kyle Austin, NREMT-P, FP-C, CCP-C
September 2026
Issue
This issue we focus on the problems that rising costs are having on the industry. Air ambulance providers are facing costs across fuel, aircraft maintenance, staffing, insurance, regulatory compliance, and specialist medical equipment. As if that wasn’t enough, delayed payments from insurers are adding further financial pressure. Despite these challenges, providers agree that patient safety and clinical quality must not be compromised.
Editorial Team
The Editorial Team updates the ITIJ website daily, and works on features for the print edition. With expert industry knowledge and years of experience in writing about complex travel insurance issues, the Editorial Team is ready to investigate and report on the topics that matter most to ITIJ's readers.